You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #27: she did NOT say the documents were "phony" [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
ldf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-18-04 05:09 PM
Response to Reply #16
27. she did NOT say the documents were "phony"
she said that SHE DID NOT TYPE THE DOCUMENTS, and that to her IT LOOKED LIKE they COULD HAVE BEEN MADE BY SOMEONE WHO HAD THE ORIGINALS, and changed them enough to be legal.

she has no way to know if they are original or not. she just knows that she didn't type them. DUH!

did she type ever single memo that he sent out? i doubt it.

the crap about typewriters, font, script, has been proven to be diversions. the typewriters WERE available, WERE used by the military, and the scripts and fonts WERE available.

i think someone OTHER THAN the secretary typed them AT THAT TIME. it would not be uncommon, nor even illogical to have someone OTHER THAN YOUR SECRETARY type a "cover your ass" memo.

he could have typed them himself. anyone with two fingers could have. knowing how to type is irrelevant. anyone can hunt and peck. it just takes a lot longer.

and if burkett found them in the trash and re-typed them, then he has the originals.

if he has the originals, when they were ordered to be destroyed, just what laws would he be breaking if he kept them. and what would be the penalties?

THAT'S a no-brainer.

geez, repetition does not make something true. everyone should know that by now.

sorry for the "screaming", just my way to add emphasis.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC