You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Kit-Kat Club: James Wolcott on the media's treatment of Kelley [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
Jade Fox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-04 09:54 PM
Original message
Kit-Kat Club: James Wolcott on the media's treatment of Kelley
Advertisements [?]
Edited on Thu Sep-16-04 09:57 PM by Jade Fox
This is a blog, so you have to scroll down a bit to find this section.

http://jameswolcott.com/

But with Kelley, the questioning is super-specific, skeptical, and suspicious
from the outset, keys in on the same hotspots from interview to interview
(coke at Camp David, his refusal to take a flight physical, Laura's reputed
past as a distribution point on campus for wacky weed), and cuts her
answers short whenever she begins to dilate on the Bush modus operandi.

-snip-

They grill her on sources, their authenticity, whether she spoke to that
person directly or relied on hearsay. And in the interviews I've seen, Kelley
has been cucumber-cool and composed, going up to the brink of the
available evidence and no further, refusing to back down from her claims of
Dubya's drug use, and more than holding her own.

-snip-

What's clear is that the news media are uncomfortable with someone
investigating the arrogant and disturbing patterns of behavior in the Bush
dynasty. They can't ignore Kitty Kelley, but they want to keep her in her
litter box. But she's a tiny tigress, and will not be contained.

-snip-

As soon as I get my greedy mitts on Kitty Kelley's epic tone poem about a
certain upper-crust white-trash clan, I intend to provide ongoing
interpretation of its findings. Michiko Kakutani was so hopping mad about it
in The Times, stamping both her little moccasins at once, that I'm convinced
La Kitty is on to something. The Times never gets that indignant about a
simple piece of pop trash; it's only when the ruling class is given the tabloid
treatment that the paper becomes institutionally huffy. And it's rather rich
for a Times writer to squawk about an author using anonymous sources. The
Times couldn't function without self-serving leaks from highly placed
urinators. It might have been better had the Times assigned the review to
Janet Maslin, who has the taste of a middlebrow hausfrau; she could have
devoured the book in one sitting and put on seven pounds.










Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC