I've been wondering about this for a couple of weeks now. Why all the outrage about an edition of 60 minutes which pointed out that which has already been confirmed via documents of unknown validity?
It seems to me that "the media" would be much more outraged about documents obviously lacking in veracity and validity...documents which were known to be fake but used anyway to lead our nation into war. Documents that any IDIOT could see were fake simply by looking at the dates and comparing them with the tenure of the signature. Documents that required NO expert to call into question.
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
