Condi admitted she "misspoke!" where's the outrage?

[buycitgo]

Democratic commission member Richard Ben-Veniste disclosed this week that Rice had asked, in her private meetings with the commission, to revise a statement she made publicly that "I don't think anybody could have predicted that those people could have taken an airplane and slam it into the World Trade Center . . . that they would try to use an airplane as a missile." Rice told the commission that she misspoke; the commission has received information that prior to Sept. 11, U.S. intelligence agencies and Clarke had talked about terrorists using airplanes as missiles

I think it's from the Post article here, but I can't get access
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A25177-2004Mar25.html


isn't this outrageous from myriad standpoints?

they go around at EVERY single fricking opportunity, nailing Clarke on his cred, and then they SNEAK to the commission, admit they LIED about one of the very most fundamental aspects of their culpability, and we hear NOTHING about it, other than in this piece

what gives, media HOES?

huh?

shouldn't this be the straw that breaks condicamel's very weak credibility back?

I mean, this is stunning news, isn't it?

or is it just me?

she wants to CHANGE her testimony!!!

imagine what they'd do if Clarke said that