You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #176: SAIC is closely tied to the CIA [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
starroute Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-03 11:44 PM
Response to Reply #140
176. SAIC is closely tied to the CIA
This is apparently no secret -- I've found it mentioned in several places, and one site even said SAIC is sometimes known jokingly as S-CIA. A piece from The Progressive says, "Another U.S. company involved in the mercenary business in the Balkans is Science Applications International Corporation, a contractor that counts many former CIA and National Security Agency types in its ranks as military personnel."

http://www.findarticles.com/cf_dls/m1295/8_6/55309049/p4/article.jhtml?term=


SAIC was even involved in a project to do psychic spying for the CIA!

"Between 1972 and 1995 hundreds of "remote viewing" (RV) experiments took place at the Stanford Research Institute (SRI) in America, and later at Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC). The CIA funded them. In July 1995 the CIA declassified documents revealing its research. There had been many claimed leaks about such programmes, with exotic names such as Sunstreak and Star Gate, but this is the first admission by the intelligence community."

<snip>

"Many successful experiments were also conducted at SAIC. One found that when subjects were being unknowingly observed on video, galvanic skin response increased. (Interestingly, the response was much greater if the subject was observed by a person of the opposite sex!) In another experiment subjects tried to guess one of a set of four images looked at by a viewer. The average "hit" rate was well over 30%, when chance would have given 25%."

http://www.innerpotential.org/pages/article/spooks.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC