Reply #6: I think that could "double-hang" him, if used right.

[Brotherjohn]

Yes, that statement reveals that he is a stubborn idiot for sticking by his claim that he would have invaded anyway based on Saddam just being a bad guy. It reveals that he initiated a war of choice with little justification (and would likely do so again).

But by answering a question "knowing what you know now", the implication is that he believed something different then (that Saddam was in cahoots with Al Qaeda and had WMDs). He has said as much on other occasions. This article reveals that he could NOT have believed these things, if he is at all competent.

So this information (while not new and known to everyone here) reveals that he and his entire White house are either incompetent or liars.