Reply #135: STEVIET, Thank you - something to think about & Will Pitt did

[Pallas180]

write that before Fahrenheit came out.

After that movie and with the publicity we helped get Plame and Edmonds which I have just watched on tvfor the second time in two nights, maybe Americans will be softened up for LIHOP if not MIHOP.

And we agree, what has occurred here as RP has said is very disappointing -leaving several of us with the feeling that we have been used for some unknown agenda, even perhaps a political operative's agenda, and a sense of betrayal.

Impolitic items posted such as labeling the researchers on this thread as "far left wing", continuing posted untruths, and other childish personal attacks and behavior in an obvious effort to disrupt and discredit the research here, while no one here has attempted to do the same on the "split-aways" thread has made any joining together of effort now or again in the future not only undesirable but unimaginable.

You've written a very thoughtful message and it is much appreciated .
One of the things you may notice that many threads ago, the title
of these threads, without objection from anyone, changed to
Plame Indictments - High Crimes & Misdemeanors -
and then even after that, with no objection it was changed to add

Plame Indictments-High Crimes & Misdemeanors - The Tip Of The Iceberg

This was done for three reasons:

1)As we began to look for why the administration was attacking Plame,
we began to discover other matters such as Cheney's double dealing nuclear components which could be considered High Crimes & Misdemeanors, impeachable treasonable offenses.

2) As the promised date of one of the posters who said Indictments would come down on July 14 as if he had inside information, came and went - and they didn't, people began demanding where were the indictments he "promised" and there was no further news, or very little leaking out of Grand Jury (in fact, nothing should have been leaking out of Grand Jury).

3) Finally, Cheney led to Plame and Plame coincided with Edmonds who spoke of illegal trafficing also and said " high elected officials would go to trial for treason" if all were known. That is when Edmonds- and Khan were added, becasue if anyone was reading the threads they could see the connections - and the trail of treason which we are researching to find if there are dots to the 9-11 connections.

We have done our work on Plame, and I'm sure you have too. The letters have been sent and the flyers offered for copying. Do we continue beating a dead horse?

Because a Grand Jury is sitting on the Plame matter, it's doubtful that the media want to touch it right now and be further embroiled in subpoenas. Beating a dead horse does not make the horse any more alive :)

Meanwhile our work on badgering the media and congress about Edmonds has paid off. And I think "that badgering" about Edmonds to have the gag order rescinded would be another chink in the Ashcroft legal wall around the misadministration. If she has information which would
lead to the trial of "elected officials", we and all of America need to hear it.

I have nothing invested in having them tried for treason on the Plame
matter as some do. I'd be just as happy if we could get them tried for treason on Edmonds, wouldn't you?

Thank you for your kind words Steviet.

Pallas