You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #43: Sometimes the best solution is the military solution... [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
John BigBootay Donating Member (574 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-04 02:21 PM
Response to Original message
43. Sometimes the best solution is the military solution...
And sometime the military solution is a load of crap.

You won't get very good answers on DU, Silverhair, because I believe most people here are willing to pretend 9/11 was an aberation, an isolated case, and that Bushco is manufacturing the terror threat.

They probably are to some extent. I don't know what the REAL level of danger is, but I believe your scenario is possible and it's worth playing "what if" games if for no other reason than to prepare mentally for a possible occurance.

First of all, my Presidency would be aggressively seeking out alternative fuel sources, and I would be withdrawing interests and mending fences in the Middle East as rapidly as possible.

But if your scenario did occur under my watch I'd make damn sure I knew all the details: who did it, where the bomb was made, where the uranium came from, who harbored the terrorists, where any funding came from. And, after obtaining whatever coalition is this time willing to fight with us, ALL the people, groups and nations who were knowingly involved in the act would receive their turn in front of the might of the coalition army. I would spare no expense and I would make every effort to kill as many terrorists who choose to fight.

During this period of warfare I would make a promise to the terrorists that another attack with nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against the United States would be answered in kind on a city in a rogue nation-- the city determined to be most dangerous, threatening or guilty. And I would keep this promise, but I would give the residents of the doomed city 2 days to evacuate.

If there was a third attack against the U.S. with weapons of mass destruction, I would use in-kind weapons on another city, this time with no warning. And I would then continue to respond in kind, as warranted by the actions of the terrorists

I know that 98% of my DU readers are gasping, laughing hysterically or rolling their eyes-- but consider what the number one job of the President is to protect America and American lives.

As I said above, sometimes there is nothing else than a strict military solution.

That said, this is nothing more than a hypothetical "war game." Ultimately, it means nothing, but merely illustrates our differences of opinion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC