You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

On science and religion ....... [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-30-04 11:51 AM
Original message
On science and religion .......
Advertisements [?]
"Shall the lion lie down with the lamb? And make love even? The Garden of Eden." --Gary Snyder; Earth House Hold


In one of the threads discussing "science" versus "religion," I mentioned the works of Viktor Frankl. He was a survivor of the Nazi death camps, who became one of the preeminent psychotherapists of the 20th century. He wrote 31 books on philosophy, psychotherapy, and neurology. The two that I think are best known in the United States are "Man's Search for Meaning: An Introduction to Logotherapy," and "Man's Search for Ultimate Meaning."

Frankl held very different views than his Viennese colleagues. When we think of Freud, we think of the will to pleasure; with Adler, we think of the will to power. Frankl, in my opinion, is more in the manner of Erich Fromm, and I think his works are of value to our society today.

Frankl believes that in the best circumstances, human beings have a drive that he calls a will to meaning. In our culture, that tends to be suppressed. It often comes through in times of severe distress. It is not at all in conflict with science; in fact, it goes hand-in-hand quite well.

However, when we think of the horrors of the Nazis, it's important to keep in mind that it was a culture based on a sick interpretation of science. The horrible abuses of human rights often involved the scientific "experiments" that occured in the death camps. The result wasn't that Frankl thought the Nazis may an error in the scientific method. Rather, he had to embrace the will to find meaning in order to survive. It wasn't because of the death camps he found that meaning; it was despite them.

I think that his theories are often viewed as related to R. Eucken's "noology." While I would not expect everyone to embrace these concepts, they offer certain advantages to discussions on a forum like DU. It does away with the need to see science and religion as polar opposites. Sometimes, mixing different things .... like hydrogen and oxygen .... works out to everyone's advantage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC