You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #99: Who said they were needy? [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
nomatrix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-04 02:17 AM
Response to Original message
99. Who said they were needy?
Maybe you noticed them, because of the holidays or is there new construction going on where tradesmen are coming in. We've been in construction a long time, and know many who live in campers because with a owning a home your furniture goes through hell every time you move.
Lots of well paid workers chose to be "gypsyesque", carry your home with you as you go. Many jobs are not for very long and pay accordingly because of the hardship of moving to area's that are
(1)very expensive to live in
(2)have very few rental nearby
(3)will not lease without a year contract


Another thought, people are looking to rid themselves of homes that carry extraordinary property taxes. Though many areas have what were considered fair taxes prior to 2001, because of the cutback in welfare to states, many are having to pick up the cost of food stamps, etc. and that all falls into taxes. No home on property, no property taxes.
WA state has extreme property taxes. Huge illegal immigration state as well. Rather than looking at how many people are living in campers, cashier at a food store, and watch the cartloads of kids paid for with food stamps.

In case you haven't noticed, the dollar is devaluating. Before the housing bubble bursts, it might be wise to cash out on the equity of your home and ride out the next couple of years with a home paid for that can move where the work is. Campground memberships and ownerships may be the wave of the future.

The reason I know something about this, is we are seriously looking at doing it. A lot of people we know have, and are living quite well.
There was a long thread one time about a CA couple living in a campground until they could afford to buy, but housing prices were accelerating faster than they could save.

What I am saying, it may not be by poor money management but by investment strategy that these people you see are living in campers.

Sorry to derail. As you were.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC