You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #11: I can see practicality [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
Dzimbowicz Donating Member (911 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-04 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. I can see practicality
with the field uniform (the helmet could have retained the same M-1942 pattern, but be made of kevlar without sacrificing protection), but the dress uniform leaves me with questions. As someone who served in both the USMC and the National Guard (Army), I did not like the way in which the new Army uniforms were designed. The Marine dress uniform is still the same, but, if I remember correctly (this was twenty years ago) the Army stated that it was trying to make their uniforms less martial in appearence. I much preferred the old khakis; they actually looked like uniforms. Once again, that is just my opinion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC