That is the point - this cannot be proven or disproven.
We do not have the tools to do so.
Therefore this argument is mostly futile.
You are simply wrong to say ID is bunk... right up until we can prove or disprove it. That's what being empirical is about.
Evolution outweighs Creationism by a significant degree based on the evidence.
Evolution is not contrary to intelligent design, there exist no data, therefore, to disprove ID.
You cannot say it's bunk, you cannot say it's fact.
I say the IDEA has merit - it should be pondered by thoughtful people at will.
If you have time - here's what I propose;
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=104&topic_id=2796124&mesg_id=2796282