You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #5: look how the react when the simple facts are given to them [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
InvisibleBallots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-26-04 09:50 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. look how the react when the simple facts are given to them
http://www.freerepublic.com/forum/a533384.htm



To: EyesWideOpen
We still need to go back farther with the timeline to get the real plan.

When was the subpoena from Starr prepared and then presented to Slick?(then negotiated into a voluntary apearance on the 17th.)

That may have well been the trigger for the embassy bombings. Anybody know that date (actual date Starr served subpoena at WH)?
From: NDCORUP (NDCORUP@aol.com) *
08/20/98 23:14:43 EDT
To: NDCORUP
The subpoena was served 10 days prior to the Capital shootings. It was the night of the shootings that the WH quietly let word out of the reciept. They kept it quiet for 10 days.
From: chuck allen (emailname) *
08/20/98 23:21:29 EDT
To: chuck allen
Best determination of date I can make is about 20 July . So it would look like this---

20 July-- Subpoena served (approx.)

28 July---Subpoena acknowledged by Twinkle Toes aka Rahm Emanuela (approx.)

28 July---Capitol Shootings(approx.)

7 Aug.---Embassies Bombed

17 Aug.---Testimony Lies

20 Aug.---Cruise Attack

This whole thing was scripted, but it wasn't by Thomason. Sorry about the approx. dates, maybe somebody has better info.

Like I've said before, Einstein had an opinion on co-incidences.
From: NDCORUP (NDCORUP@aol.com) *
08/20/98 23:55:05 EDT

This is a scene from the movie 'Wag The Dog' which was in the can weeks if not months before Monica's black beret was introduced to the world ... Do you suppose Hollywood had some inside info on Monica that found it's way into the 'Wag'/ beret rope line scene?
From: Phil V. (pharmer@directcon.net) *
08/21/98 00:19:08 EDT
To: NDCORUP
I will be keeping an eye out for the "credible evidence" that intelligence knew about bin Laden being involved in the african embassy bombings. Today, it was mentioned that it is very possible that intelligence could have intercepted communication between bin Laden and his cronies that implicated them directly and unequivocally to the bombing, perhaps by wire tap. There is a problem with that. If they could intercept communication after the bombing, certainly they could have intercepted it before the bombing. Wasn't there multiple warnings this was going to happen, including from Israel? The real question is if intelligence knew about this plan beforehand and told Clinton, and he did nothing.
From: EyesWideOpen () *
08/21/98 00:20:13 EDT
To: Phil V.
I know you, and I, and other freepers, didn't just fall off the turnip truck last night. I don't believe in UFO's but this whole thing is Hollywoodish.

ps. can you bring up The Omen pic? please.
From: chuck allen (emailname) *
08/21/98 00:24:49 EDT
To: EyesWideOpen

So glad you posted this timeline. Seems to clear Clinton, doesn't it? So rational. So neat. Absolutely nothing to do with the unpleasantness in Washington.

Question, Eyes Wide Open: How many coincidences, how many lies, does this man plan to push off on us? Do you believe him, and if so, why?

From: redman () *
08/21/98 00:28:37 EDT

To: EyesWideOpen
—11 a.m. EDT. The mission commences halfway around the world and targets are struck about 1:30 p.m. EDT. Clinton speeds in a bronze sport utility van to a school in Edgartown, Mass., to inform reporters. After a brief statement, he makes calls to congressional leaders.

Is this true? He told reporters before notifying congress?!?!? In the real world shouldn't it be the other way around!!??
From: jellybean () *
08/21/98 01:05:39 EDT

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC