You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer
supported by the Administrators.
Visit
The New DU. Reply #29: I do see your point
[View All]
huskerlaw
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-26-05 07:16 PM
Response to Reply #18 |
|
but to me, this particular instance would not have been a case of "obstructing en masse" this was the nomination of a Secretary of Defense. To me, that's important enough to stick our necks out. It's right up there with blocking Supreme Court nominees...and the next Attorney General as well.
|
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread