|
I have zero tolerance for not doing your job impeccably. This is quite different than the drugs issue, to be frank. Recall the last time you had too much to drink and how you felt the next morning. Had you been in at work that morning, how would be your performance? Have you ever had a really heated domestic fight and gone in to work and been very absent minded? So many things can affect work performance and the ultimate question is whether or not the person is a professional.
I do not make mistakes like that in my profession. It is a matter of professional impeccability and you pay me in my field, much as a brain surgeion in his/her field, to do a job without error... no matter how i feel, what domestic argument's i've had, or what i've been up to in my private time. If you have a mechanic who puts control rods in backwards, then that is a serious dereliction of duty and you should relieve him/her... no matter about drugs.
I find that professional trust and confidence is the best way to inspire people to do "perfect" work. Trust and goodwill are much more powerful motivators than the threat of a drugs test. I've never had a problem when running engineering teams with people failing to be impeccable, it is a reflection of the management.
A bad mechanic will always have an excuse as to why he/she put the rod in backwards. A good one will simply do the job right, and never make an excuse no matter what the conditions. Conditioning a good employee, is never achieved with the stick/carrot.. rather pay incentives are designed around perfect performance, and work is double checked as a matter of quality verification, that everyone is able to trust that they look out for each other, that the whole operation works spoot on.
My operation will get the mechanics who hate being drugs testted even if they are not using drugs.... i'll get the smart ones who hate being invaded, who'd rather be trusted as professionals... you discount this major factor in your liability analysis.
|