Sen. Roberts has turned the Intel Committee into an arm of Karl Rove's political operation
From Josh Marshall's Talking Points Memo
<snip>
Note that there are
no congressional investigations into the origin of the Niger forgeries, the outing of Valerie Plame, and countless other scandals and mysteries large and small. (Remember, after the 2004 election, Roberts announced that there's now not enough time for the investigation into possible political manipulation of Iraqi WMD intel, which he promised prior to the election.)
But now there
will be congressional hearings into whether the CIA does a good enough job at protecting the 'cover' of its agents in its Directorate of Operations.
<snip>
The only other possibility -- one which I've referred to jokingly in the past -- is to argue that she wasn't
covert enough. That is to say, maybe she was covert to the CIA. But she really wasn't covert up to the standards of say, Bill Safire or Tucker Carlson or Bill O'Reilly. And
this, understand, is the premise of the new Roberts' hearings. Was she really covert enough? And does the CIA really know how to define 'covert'.
<snip>
The only reason Chairman Roberts now wants hearings into this question is that it might generate more fodder for excuse-making for those who will climb any mountain and ford any stream to avoid holding any of the president's lieutenants to account.
<snip>
more...
http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/week_2005_07_24.php#006153