You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I've decided I don't care what Harriet Miers' ideological positions are. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
Plaid Adder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 08:11 AM
Original message
I've decided I don't care what Harriet Miers' ideological positions are.
Advertisements [?]
Edited on Tue Oct-04-05 08:31 AM by Plaid Adder
She is unqualified for the job. That should be the end of it.

If I were Ruth Bader Ginsberg or Sandra Day O'Connor, I would be spitting nails. They both had to work like demons to get where they are, and you can say what you want about O'Connor but both of them were coming up at a time when women lawyers were an endangered species. They made it because they had something.

Harriet Miers has a law degree and some experience practicing law. Great. If that were enough to get you a Supreme Court berth, my partner should have been appointed long ago. And I wish she had been, because I'm sure she's smarter than any woman who can say Bush is brilliant and mean it, and I'm sure she's got more integrity, better ethics, and a greater love of our COnstitutional freedoms than any woman who can look at George W. Bush and smile like she's glad to see him.

Miers's only relevant qualification is having licked Bush's cowboy boots for years. The fact that she once donated to Gore's presidential campaign--at a time when Texas was Democratic--merely indicates that she is a weathervane that follows the prevailing political winds. And sure, isn't that exactly who you want on the Supreme Court? You know, the body that's supposed to compensate for the whims and caprices of the democratic process because it's administered by people who don't have to run for election?

This is cronyism on an order of magnitude that I dreamt not of. Liza and I were thinking he would put up Owen, or Edith "Predator Class" Jones, or some other crazy Texas woman judge. We'd have been greatly upset by either, because they're both hard-right ideologues, plus Owen is a complete shill for big business--but at least they're judges. Fuckin' yeesh, man.

Best commentary I've seen on this was from a friend of mine on another list: "I've figured out how Bush makes his senior appointments. He looks around the room, and goes, 'Hey, how about you?'"

Sigh,

The Plaid Adder
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC