You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Does * breaks the law every time he uses the troops as a backdrop. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
MelissaB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-05 05:08 PM
Original message
Does * breaks the law every time he uses the troops as a backdrop.
Advertisements [?]
Edited on Tue Nov-15-05 05:48 PM by MelissaB
To make a long story short, I met someone currently in the military at the vigil we had for the 2,000+ troops who died in Iraq. During the conversation he said that * is breaking the law every time he uses the troops as a backdrop. I received his permission today to use the information from an email in a post at DU.


... Sections of the Hatch Act Amendments specifically state that, "Political Activities On Duty Prohibited. The law prohibits employees from engaging in political activity (1) while on duty; (2) in any room or building occupied in the discharge of official duties by an employee or officeholder of the U.S. government or any agency or instrumentality thereof; (3) while wearing a uniform or official insignia identifying their office or position; or (4) using any vehicle owned or leased by the U.S. government or any agency or instrumentality thereof. The Senate Committee on Governmental Affairs report accompanying the legislation states that "politics on the job, including the wearing of political buttons, is prohibited.""

Furthermore, military personnel are governed by internal directives that mirror the Hatch Amendment. One of these directives is DoD Directive 1344.10, "Political Activities by Members of the Armed Forces on Active Duty," June 15, 1990.

The directive is explicit:

"1. General rules. DoD Directive 1334.1, Wearing of the Uniform, May 17, 2004, paragraph 3.1, reads in as follows:
3. POLICY
3.1. The wearing of the uniform by members of the Armed Forces (including retired members and members of Reserve components) is prohibited under any of the following circumstances:
3.1.2. During or in connection with the furtherance of political activities, private employment or commercial interests, when an inference of official sponsorship for the activity or interest may be drawn."


Sincerely,

XXX




Somebody please tell this asshole to find another stage without our military.

Edited to make the title a statement becasue it seems not to be black and white.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC