If you have moral objections to it, I can understand that.
I am taking exception to the person who started this thread, because she is repeatedly advancing theories that this defendant is innocent (one example:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=104&topic_id=5519400&mesg_id=5521159) and then she runs from "debate" about his guilt even when she ASKS for debate. She has been soundly debunked in many threads and never addresses the points raised by people who do not share her view.