Reply #15: BS on top of BS on top of BS on top of BS on top of BS

[wadestock]

I'm starting to really wonder about this site.

The wife stands up and says he's off his medication.
He's bipolar....looks like he's acting irratic.

Meanwhile...
err...
let me think now....

Ah....he got on the plane with explosives...isn't that interesting?

Hmm.....how exactly did that happen?
This is an interesting "fail safe" approach don't you think?
Nice little "fill in the holes" regarding our inability to screen carry on.

Let's try this again. Seems to me they didn't know how to screen the explosives on carry on...doesn't it....AH DUH@#$%%%^$$#@!

So....then of course we put the blame on the guy...right?
That makes all this inability to screen carry on all better now doesn't it?

TRUTH

A decision was made to waste the guy by these untrained piece of shit air marshalls....extremely quickly...and without logic.

There was NO consideration about the fact that there is a MINIMUM chance that A QUANTITY OF EXPLOSIVES GOT ON THE PLANE IN THE FIRST PLACE.

Let's examine the logic.

1. He was acting threatening. (yeah so why didn't he blow up the plane so far....or wait till it was in the air to make 100 times the damage)
2. He had a bag. (yeah so what)
3. He threatened to blow up the plane. (I guess that's a great reason to get instantly wasted)
4. He was wasted...actually OUTSIDE the plane. (Hmmm...now that he's actually OFF the plane....maybe we could just jump him)

Properly trained marshalls that had any balls and brains would have quickly jumped him.
The mindset of wasting someone like this in the first place is what led to the problem.