Reply #129: wrong, wrong and wrong

[G_j]

stray slightly from the subject of 'military strategy' in which you are a self proclaimed expert and you reveal quite a lot which frankly should put in question everything else you have said.

Since when do facts need your assessment to be facts?

one) According to the Nuremberg tribunals, "no grievances or policies will
justify resort to aggressive war. It is utterly renounced
and condemned as an instrument of policy."

Statement by U.S. Supreme Court Justice Robert L. Jackson
Chief U.S. Prosecutor
at the Nuremberg Tribunals

August 12, 1945
on War Trials Agreement; August 12, 1945

http://www.yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/imt/jack02.htm

~~
two) we were not lied into the war?

Look up the definition of lying, if you can't grasp the concept of lying then the issue is not worth discussing.
It wouldn't even be amusing to hear whatever belabored contortions you would go through to attempt to explain to us poor clueless people how the Admin. didn't lie us into war. Don't bother.
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl:


three) So you really think the Iraq war is all about fighting al Qa eda?
Another 'talking point' that has no factual basis. The actual percentage of the "insurgents" with even the slimmest connection to al Qa-eda is very small. But don't let facts get in your way.


In all, I think we have been pretty generous to let you hang out here and preach at us.