You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #129: I multi-task [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
Laurab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 11:03 PM
Response to Reply #107
129. I multi-task
there are so many issues these days, but really, for the sake of the WORLD I think we need to educate ourselves on things like this. I'm not a government expert at all, but I've familiarized myself enough with this particular administration to know that with them, anything is possible.

Hard as it was for me to believe that our leaders could have actually ALLOWED 9/11 to happen on purpose, or worse MADE it happen, after reading a few books, reading the official explanations (that really make no sense whatsoever), and most of all, knowing that the administration did everything in its power to stop ANY investigation of what happened that day, one has to wonder. A couple of books "The New Pearl Harbor" - "The Terror Timeline" and one about the omissions and distortions of the 911 report are eye-opening.

If you stop to think about it - the President of the United States is in a known location, the country is under attack, and he STAYS in that known location - not worried at all about his own safety, or the safety of the "children he didn't want to alarm". That just doesn't make sense to me. Then there's the little quashing of any investigation, and then, when one finally had to be done to save face, it was staffed by people very sympathetic to the administration. They couldn't get information they needed from the agencies involved, and couldn't ask the questions that they needed to ask.

If you were President, wouldn't you encourage, in fact INSIST on an investigation, rather than going to great lengths not to have one?

Just some food for thought. It's not really a question of Bush and Cheney being smart - there's the whole PNAC, and unfortunately, there are some great, albeit deranged, minds involved.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC