Reply #12: Interesting how his writing supports our arguments against him.

[Nitrogenica]

For example, when a liberal posts an argument against something Gibson said, usually it describes exactly what he said, when he said it, who he was speaking to, and often the evidence of his words are given with an actual clip or sound byte.

Republican arguments usually do not include direct evidence, rather they include cliche's supported with opinion that pulls on the readers heartstrings (if your Republican, that is).

This piece is a perfect example of the latter, for example {Names like "fathead" and "the worst something or other" for things I really did not say.} What did he say?...who said "FATHEAD?!" (c'mon what liberal would use that word). WHERE IS THE FACTUAL EVIDENCE.

Meanwhile, the 5 + year smearing of Americans who are liberals continues as always. Their motto is to Divide and conquer, and the 58 million who voted for Kerry, if they get mad about it.....FUCK THEM. They smear us so they can stay in power. Unfortunately for them they think it's still 2002. The war on Christmas was another Schavio for them. They look like fools now.

Just to stoop to the Repugs level...John Gibson is a MORAN.