You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #59: "It verged on outright corruption" [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
crickets Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-10-04 06:55 PM
Response to Reply #17
59. "It verged on outright corruption"
- Robert Strong, admin officer

I went back and watched both programs again.

Barnes did call it "preferential treatment," on Wednesday night, but went no further than that.

All of Strong's interview segments were obviously taped at the same time, so this wasn't something new that he was asked about today. Strong's beginning comments are the same as they were on Wednesday, up to "...and what were the people that were involved." At that point on Wed, there was a cut to a question from Dan, "Was he (Killian), in your judgement, a straight shooter?" to which Strong replied, "He was a straight arrow guy," etc. Later in the program, Strong makes telling "power begets power" comments about preferential treatment.

Tonight included a different portion of the interview instead.

Strong: "They are compatible with the way business was done at that time, they are compatible with the man I remember Jerry Killian being, I don't see anything in the documents that are discordant with what were the times, what were the situation, and what were the people that were involved."

Rather (VO): "Strong says the highly charged political atmosphere of the Guard at the time was perfectly represented in the newly revealed documents." (This reflects two portions of the Strong interview shown Wednesday which were not shown tonight.)

Strong: "It verged on outright corruption in terms of the favors that were done, the power that was traded, and it was unconscionable. From a moral and ethical standpoint, it was unconscionable."

I don't think it was a new claim about corruption. It looks as though Strong's more emphatic comments just were not used until tonight. I'm still hoping for an expanded version of the whole thing this Sunday. *evilgrin*

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC