4. I think that is one reason they said they had other information
that confirmed this story. They did not run it on the basis of the documents alone, although what they showed of their experts was pretty convincing. I am certain that this story was far, FAR more carefully vetted than most. And Rather made it very clear that they are standing by this story, that there has been NO credible evidence against the documents being real.
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
