You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #84: But one must ask the question... [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
Liberal Veteran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-28-04 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #81
84. But one must ask the question...
What good does it do in the long run if the advertising prices the drug out of the market of the elderly?

Or if the insurance company will not approve a particular drug in it's formulary because the costs are so high due to excessive marketing of the drug (as opposed to high costs due to manufacturing or R&D).

I take the side that unrestrained advertising and marketing by pharmaceutical companies is contributing directly to the problem of rising health care/drug costs in our country.

The costs of advertising are not being limited to the drug companies. They are being passed along to the consumer in the form of extremely high prescription prices. This in turn affects the very elderly that COULD be helped by those drugs if they weren't out of reach of their budget.

A new analysis provided by the managed care industry reports that from 1999 to 2000, prescriptions written for the top 50 most heavily advertised drugs rose 24.6 percent, compared to 4.3 percent for all other drugs combined. It also has given the industry a shield by claiming advertising is a necessary expense whenever someone challenges the fact that the pharmaceutical companies are simply put, the most profitable industries in the nation.


While the overall profits of Fortune 500 companies declined by 53 percent - the second deepest dive in profits the Fortune 500 has taken in its 47 years 1 - the top 10 U.S. drug makers increased profits by 33 percent.

So it begs the question: Is the benefit of direct to consumer advertising that gets a few people to call their doctor to ask if Crankistatin is right for them really offset by the costs that are passed along to consumers and possibly even pricing the medication out of reach of those who have to pay out of pocket?

I think not. I think we need to overhaul the entire pharmaceutical industry. They are gouging us at every turn and DTC advertising is just a part of that equation that needs to be dealt with in this country.

Those are costs that passed directly to the consumer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC