You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #70: So How Many More Wounded And Dead GI's Would Be Acceptable? [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
Itsthetruth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-26-05 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #68
70. So How Many More Wounded And Dead GI's Would Be Acceptable?
Edited on Tue Apr-26-05 01:45 PM by Itsthetruth
"Of course everyone wants to bring the troops home, the only debate is on how, when, and what needs to be accomplished before the US can withdraw."

How can the troops be brought home? No debate on that at all. Use planes and boats.

So the real political conflict is between those who want an end to the occupation of Iraq and want to bring our troops home and those who defend Bush's occupation of Iraq and insist we "can't cut and run" from Iraq and want to keep U.S. troops in Iraq.

Those in the ranks of the Democratic Party leadership (Dean, Clinton, Kerry, Reid, etc.,) who oppose withdrawl believe the United States government, preferably under their leadership, has a right to dictate the economic and political affairs of the Iraqi people. It's colonialism with a liberal face. They are clearly opposed to the right of self-determination and independence for people in other nations. That's one reason why you don't see them speak out loud and clear in opposition to the Bush's governments policies against Venezeula.

We saw a similiar conflict during the Vietnam War. The anti-Vietnam war movement demanded the withdrawl of U.S. troops in Vietnam. It fought against both Democratic and Republican party leaders and Presidents who insisted that they couldn't "cut and run" from Vietnam because all kinds of horrible things would happen.

In Vietnam over 50,000 GI's and over a million Vietnamese lost their lives bacause of a colonial war based upon a torrent of lies. How many more GI's and Iraq's shall lose their lives in a colonial war of occupation justified with lies and deception?

You have a right to support the imperial occupation. And the Iraqi people have a right to oppose foreign occupation domination of their nation.

If John Kerry had been elected President would the anti-war movement have to fight against President Kerry's occupation of Iraq just as we had to fight against LBJ's occupation of Vietnam? Probably. But, the anti-war movement will win this battle no matter who the President is just like we achieved success in forcing the government to withdraw from Vietnam.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC