Reply #16: They are happy we are focusing on Rove, it diverts us from Bush/Cheney.

[Baconfoot]

Every time we say "Rove Rove Rove" I bet they are saying "Yeeeeeesssss. Look at the ball at the end of the string oh my kitten. See how it moves around on its own. Pay no attention to that 2xx lb poor excuse for a primate attached to the other end."

Poor on defense? Ha. As soon as we start thinking something like that, we should start thinking that we are WRONG about WHAT IT IS that they are defending. They are protecting "the flag" as a Stratego fan might say - in this case the Presidency of GWB.

We all guess, and I think it's a good guess, that this is bigger than Rove.

At the very least, Bush is protecting a traitor. Off with his crown I say.

We SHOULDN'T be waiting to see the end of Bush's reign in 2008. It says right there on that piece of paper that congress "SHALL" impeach that SOB, not that they shall consider whether or not it's politically expedient. It "SHALL" remove him from office. It's one of the few COMMANDS in the constitution. It doesn't have the status of merely granting permission.