Reply #4: posted elsewhere but it's appropriate to re-state

[TinfoilHatProgrammer]

5. These memos are more properly termed "Evidence," because they contain evidence of a pattern of lawbreaking that dates back at least to 1999.

They're also more properly termed "evidence" because the material (internal email) in question was stolen. One poster on the message board also appears to take credit for procuring said stolen material, and for subsequently posting it in Italy and then in Korea. The same poster then followed up by publishing photos and home phone numbers for a number of Diebold employees -- ostensibly so that these people could be harrassed or threatened. I'm sure that any information about that particular poster would constitute "evidence" as well, and if Diebold or the FBI subpoenaed that information it wouldn't be terribly surprising.


JC