You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #15: I don't have to be FOR someone to be against the DP [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
Protagoras Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-08-05 11:37 AM
Response to Original message
15. I don't have to be FOR someone to be against the DP
And I don't have to "Support" Tookie to push for Clemency. Again and again we aren't talking about letting this man out. We are talking about letting him live the rest of his life in a max security prison.

Aside from all the racial, economic, evidence, etc. arguments against the DP there are deeper issues in this case.

I think Tookie brings up a unique opportunity for us all to examine what it is we desire from our "Justice" system. And it should prompt us to discuss what, if anything, qualifies as meaningful change/redemption in an individual. Can people change? IF they do, should we recognize it? Or if you do something now should you be forever guilty of it regardless of the time and change that has occurred?

Assume he did everything we imagine he could and may have done...assume he was a 100% bastard 20 years ago. Are we executing THAT bastard? Or is he who he is today? Does who he is today matter at all? IF not, then what is the role for grace, forgiveness etc in our culture? I suspect there is a lot to this that most people have never really answered for themselves.

And because I think there are so many un-answered, un-debated, un-clear issues surrounding not only the DP...but how we want to treat people who have CHANGED...I think we can be big enough to push the giant PAUSE button on this one so that we can spend some time thinking about it. We've waited 20 years to KILL someone...that fact in itself makes me scratch my head...the only thing more absurd is that after waiting 20 years we are now in a desperate RUSH to do it as if he's going somewhere.

Once he dies who is responsible for all the deaths keeping him alive might have avoided?

None of these questions necessitate thinking he is innocent...but they might cause us to question this rush to do what it is that's being done.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC