You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #8: Speaking as an architect... [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
never cry wolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-04 11:51 AM
Response to Original message
8. Speaking as an architect...
Who specializes in industrial buildings, no roof is flat. They all pitch some. Yes, it is more economical but it is also more practical. If you had a building with a 300' depth just how would you propose to build a sloped roof. Wood is out in a building that size due to building codes, prefab steel trusses are too large to transport and field fabricating a steel truss would be very labor intensive and costly.

In addition, sloped roofs have their own variety of problems. For a standard industrial building or strip mall the gutters would have to be HUGE, like 24" wide and 24" deep. What do you do with that water? Spill it onto grade, in many municipaitites that is illegal, not to mention that you would create an ice rink at each downspout in the winter. Sliding snow also plays havoc with gutters, and anything that happens to be underneath it. Leaves, birds nests, etc. also make a gutter system a pain in the ass to maintain, plus they freeze.

With a nominal flat roof system, the roof pitches to roof drains spaced every so often. These run into internal downspouts which never freeze and are piped directly into the storm water management system underground, again, no freezing, no maintenance.

I am not familiar with the building failure you mention above, but the building codes are quite strict as to what a roof load needs to be engineered for. Add to this about 3 layers of safety factors build into all structural design and if engineered and constructed properly there would be no collapses, even under more that design loads. A building that fails generally has human error as the cause. If designed properly, a "flat" roof is a much more efficient receptor for rain and snow than a sloped roof.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC