You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Least successful music genre? [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
Screaming Lord Byron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-04 06:40 PM
Original message
Least successful music genre?
Advertisements [?]
Edited on Fri Mar-26-04 06:44 PM by Screaming Lord Byron
My nomination goes to 'Romo'. It existed for six weeks in London in early 1996, purely because two guys who wrote for the thankfully now-defunct Melody Maker were bored. And it sucked dogs eggs.

http://www.thisisromo.com/

What is Romo?
For 6 months in late '95/early '96 London had it's own Studio 54 scene which was actually spread over 2 clubs, Arcadia and Club Skinny. Think celebrity, excess and glamour. It took 16 years from the fall of Studio 54 to the birth of Romo. A lineage of successful London clubs have sprung from the heady days of summer 1995.


http://www.the-horse.net/orllive.htm

LOOKS LIKE WE FAILED, then. This was Orlando's last gig. That's a shame, but hardly a surprise, a depressingly inevitable end to a frustrating story.

Rewind to March 1996. In a few select London venues, something called Romo is happening - but more importantly, it's also happening in the pages of Melody Maker. Towards the end of the golden Allan Jones era, two journalists called Simon Price and Taylor Parkes are allowed to write about a different Romo group every week, with prose so colourful and full of conviction that it fairly leaps off the page. At a time when Britpop is booming - Weller, OCS and the absolutely baffling Cast are in the Top 20 - Simon and Taylor write about groups with names like Hollywood, Plastic Fantastic, Massive Ego, Viva!, Sexus… and Orlando. Sure, there's glitter and make-up and synths but, more importantly, there's verve and drama and daring and grand gestures. It's disposable pop music at its most thrilling, and right then, it's essential. The great Allan Jones allows Romo a cover feature and a free cover-mounted cassette - and there it is, Nature's Hated by a duo called Orlando, Tim Chipping and Dickon Edwards.

The first point to note is that Orlando immediately stuck out like a sore thumb. Nature's Hated was the only song on that tape not to rely at all on drama-pop icons like Soft Cell, Human League or Roxy Music (for inspiration, or for direct assistance - the other tracks were produced by Almond, Thurston, Ball, and Chris Hughes). It was a ballad built on pianos and violins - gorgeous, ingenuous, unabashed pop, a skinny white male take on The Carpenters and late-period Supremes - with words that immediately announced Dickon Edwards as an intelligent, high-stakes lyricist who could easily pick up the Moz/Richey baton.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC