You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Offer us a cool, but unusual word you like. Give us a sentence containing it. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
NNadir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-09 12:10 AM
Original message
Offer us a cool, but unusual word you like. Give us a sentence containing it.
Advertisements [?]
Edited on Mon Feb-16-09 12:12 AM by NNadir
Here's mine: Aleatory.

The word means "depending on random fluctuations.

In literature there is Aleatoricism where the writer claims to be unaware of what he or she has written.

The sentence I encountered this word in was this:


The input parameters can be design as well as critical and the uncertainties can be aleatory or epistemic, however here they are treated same.


Here's the context, which although the word is cool and non-technical, comes from a technical paper:

3.3. Functional reliability analysis

As stated in Section 2, SGDHRS can fail because of classical component failures or functional failure. Functional reliability analysis for passive safety systems is quantification of the margin to failure in the appropriate response space. The margin could be affected by the following uncertainties

(1) The uncertainties associated with the parameters that govern
the system performance.

(2) Uncertainties due to the inherent non linearity in the
process.

(3) Uncertainties associated with the computer code
calculations.

(4) Uncertainties due to the interaction between the parallel
loops of the system.

Currently the standard procedure is to get the response uncertainty by propagation of the uncertainties in input parameters through a validated thermal hydraulic code (Bianchi et al., 2001). The input parameters can be design as well as critical and the uncertainties can be aleatory or epistemic, however here they are treated same. The interaction between the parallel loops can affect the functional reliability of passive systems (Mackay et al, 2008).


The reference is Annals of Nuclear Energy, in a "ASAP" article just published on line called "Integration of functional reliability analysis with hardware reliability: An application to safety grade decay heat removal system of Indian 500 MWe PFBR," by Mathews et al.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC