Reply #17: Thomas' remarks to Russert were so evasive

[FizzFuzz]

Typical!

I just saw some of this this morning, and I could barely make any sense of what he was talking about, much less what the overall goals are. Russert would ask a clear question, and this guy just spewed back a nebulous word salad. :mad:

Seems to me, reducing what women receive would put them in worse poverty, for a longer time. (Than they already are--I seem to remember seeing statistics many times showing elderly women have the highest rate of poverty? Or is that after women heading single families? ... darn my memory. Works nicely with women's lowered earning rates, too--NOT)