Reply #3: And of course, wind plants and coal plants don't.

[NNadir]

As usual the anti-nukes are full of shit and display the typical ignorance of the second law of thermodynamics.

It will be a cold day in Chad when we find one case of an anti-nuke who gives a rat's ass about endangered species and coal, or for that matter, endangered species and wind power.

I wonder if there are any dumb anti-nukes who had whooping crane puree soup with that crap they drink at yuppie dinners this Easter?

As usual, the concern trolls who insist that only nuclear energy need be perfect and the stuff they don't give a rat's ass can kill people and anything else are notable only for their selective attention.

http://dsc.discovery.com/news/2008/03/04/wind-farms-cranes.html

Nuclear power need not be perfect to be vastly superior to everything else. It only needs to be better than everything else.

440 nuclear power plants operate on the face of this planets, producing nearly 30 exajoules of energy. The same twits who don't care about how many species have been rendered extinct by dams cannot produce a single case, not one, of a single species wiped out by nuclear energy.

Not one.

Zero.

If you can't be honest, make shit up.

The attempt by the stupid to destroy existing nuclear infrastructure via selective attention and appeals to ignorance and selective attention will destroy many species because EVERY nuclear power plant destroyed by such ignorance has been replaced by dangerous fossil fuels.

The anti-nukes couldn't care less about dangerous fossil fuel waste or the climate change it causes. It's why they rail against the world's largest, by far, source of climate change gas free primary energy.