You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #1: I recomend everyone read the actual report. Green peace glosses over a lot. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
Statistical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-10 10:40 PM
Response to Original message
1. I recomend everyone read the actual report. Green peace glosses over a lot.
Edited on Tue May-11-10 10:43 PM by Statistical
http://ec.europa.eu/energy/nuclear/safety/doc/2010_eurobarometer_safety.pdf

Some highlights of what I found interesting:

France is not that pro nuclear (about middle of the pack when it comes to EU).

Europeans believe nuclear energy reduces energy imports by 3 to 1 (Agree to disagree).
Europeans believe nuclear energy leads to more competitive and stable prices by a margin of 3 to 2 (Agree to Disagree).

Although Greenpeace tries to play it as a negative:
Europeans are more likely to agree than disagree with statement that nuclear energy helps to limit climate change 46% to 36%.


A country that continually answers very pro-nuclear (almost always) at top of country list is Denmark but Denmark doesn't have any reactors....

The anti-nuclear sentiment is not evenly distributed in Europe. There are pockets with very high anti-nuclear sentiment but most of them have no nuclear reactors and no plans for new ones meaning that sentiment is unlikely to shape future politics.

Pro-nuclear answers directly correlates to higher education.
Age doesn't correlate at all (equally pro/anti nuclear among young, middle aged, old).
Men more pro-nuclear than women.
Countries with nuclear power tend to be more pro-nuclear.
Former soviet bloc countries tend to be mixed bag with some pro-nuclear and some strongly anti-nuclear

This question:
In your opinion, should the current level of nuclear energy as a proportion of all energy
sources be reduced, maintained the same or be increased?
.....2006 2009
Reduced. 39% 34% -5%
Maintain 34% 39% +5%
Increase 14% 17% +3%
Not Sure 13% 19% -3%


Of course even maintaining share of nuclear energy requires new reactor construction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC