Reply #17: All I said, Inhofe land boy, is that YOU didn't Lovins stupid paper.

[NNadir]

And um, you didn't.

I didn't say anything at all about myself, and your comments about ME have nothing to do with the fact that YOU didn't read Lovins stupid paper.

That said, I have always felt that the backwoods anti-science anti-nuke hicks who write here love Lovins so much because, like them, he's a wild cat coal freak.

Here's Lovins remarks, in his very stupid high school level line of trash from 1976:

Perhaps the most exciting current development is the so-called fluidized-bed system for burning coal (or virtually any other combustible material). Fluidized beds are simple, versatile devices that add the fuel a little at a time to a much larger mass of small, inert, redhot particles—sand or ceramic pellets—kept suspended as an agitated fluid by a stream of air continuously blown up through it from below.

-Amory Lovins, "The Road Not Taken," Foreign Affairs October 1976, page 85.

The bold is mine.

I have not met ONE anti-nuke - all of whom prove be at, best, semi-literate - who is NOT an apologist for coal.

No wonder all the stupidos here stop in to worship the little mindless fucker.

I've been to India. Unlike the Snowmass paid off dangerous fossil fuel apologist Lovins, I give a fuck about poverty, and no, I don't think that maintaining poverty in India in the name of some conservation horseshit - even with horseshit to gasoline fantasies the dipshits here like to hype - is a wise or ethical pastime, because I've seen in India the wild cat coal that all the hicks, including the hick Lovins, are so fond of.

Have a nice unlettered day, Inhofe boy.