Reply #25: You managed to come up with 2 anti-coal posts in the past 4 years??? That's your proof???

[txlibdem]

You list 3 posts from 2007 till now, one of which says "nuclear is far worse than coal or natural gas" so I wouldn't call that one an anti-coal post, just one more in the endless line of posts against zero-carbon energy sources like nuclear. How many anti-nuke posts have you made in just the past month?!?

As I and others have shown time and again, coal puts out more radioactive material than nuclear, causes more deaths than nuclear as well. The Mercury from coal pollution has polluted the majority of US lakes and rivers -- you can't even catch a darn fish and eat it in most parts of our nation thanks to coal.

If all of the anti-nuke posters here on DU would regularly post the truth about coal, oil and natural gas pollution (including radioactive material dredged up by each of them) and come out publicly to state that we need to end coal first, oil second and then start to end nuclear power, I'd be right there by your side.

Which one to end first -- that's a critical question for the continued survival of the human race.