You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #17: Your conclusion is unfounded. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-11 08:42 AM
Response to Reply #10
17. Your conclusion is unfounded.
If hydro and nuclear permit us to avoid the emission of some carbon, they can permit us to avoid the emission of more carbon. Though there's a limit to how much hydro can contribute, there's no theoretical limit to how much nuclear can contribute, even to the point of reducing carbon emissions.

Past performance is no guarantee of future profits, and trying to quantify ignorance as a factor into why nuclear isn't as publicly "acceptable" as coal is futile.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC