You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What is the energy content of nuclear weapons? [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
NNadir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-14-05 08:36 PM
Original message
What is the energy content of nuclear weapons?
Advertisements [?]
Edited on Wed Dec-14-05 08:36 PM by NNadir
Recently I learned that much of the world's enriched uranium for power plants is provided by Russia, the fuel being mixed down material from dismantled nuclear weapons. This arrangement arose because of a Clinton era treaty in which the United States agreed to buy its fuel from Russia in order to destroy the fissionable material contained in Soviet nuclear weapons. For the Russians, the Americans, humanity as a whole and the environment this was a win-win-win-win. Without the destruction of isolated highly enriched uranium (and for that matter, plutonium), meaningful nuclear disarmament is not really possible. Russia now provides nuclear fuel to every major nuclear nation on earth, except Taiwan, Taiwan being excluded for political reasons.

For nearly a decade much of the uranium fuel worldwide provided to nuclear power plants has come from inventory and not from mines, as there has been a huge surplus of fissionable material.

Recently I read the Nobel Peace Prize lecture of Dr. Mohamed Elbaradei http://nobelprize.org/peace/laureates/2005/elbaradei-lecture-en.html who has been a tireless worker for the advancement of nuclear power and for the prevention of nuclear war. I was struck by this remark he made:

We still have eight or nine countries who possess nuclear weapons. We still have
27,000 warheads in existence. I believe this is 27,000 too many.

A good start would be if the nuclear-weapon states reduced the strategic role given to these weapons. More than 15 years after the end of the Cold War, it is incomprehensible to many that the major nuclear-weapon states operate with their arsenals on hair-trigger alert – such that, in the case of a possible launch of a nuclear attack, their leaders could have only 30 minutes to decide whether to retaliate, risking the devastation of entire nations in a matter of minutes.



These considerations led me to consider the energy content of nuclear weapons. If we assume that the average nuclear weapon contains 20 kg of fissionable material, we see that 27,000 nuclear weapons would contain about 540,000 kg of fissionable material. Since a nuclear weapon typically has an isotopic concentration wherein the fissionable isotopes represent about 95%, one can show that the total energy content is about 41 exajoules. For comparison, the entire energy demand of the United States is about 100 exajoules. Thus the amount of energy in the world's nuclear weapons is enough to fuel all of the energy demand (from all sources) in the entire United States for about 5 months.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC