You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #18: right. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
kristopher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 01:49 AM
Response to Reply #15
18. right.
Edited on Sun Jun-01-08 01:50 AM by kristopher
Something that looks like it. You need to decide which argument you want to use. You posit one thing, it is answered, instead of acknowledgment you then slither on to another tack, when it is answered you again slide back to the first as if it had never been uttered before. Just like any other fundie arguing from faith instead of facts...

There is no shortage of fuel in the gas tanks of automobiles.
There is no shortage of fuel in the pipeline at the refineries.
There is no shortage of fuel in the tankers or transportation pipelines.
There is no shortage of fuel at point of production.

If supply were not matched to demand, the above would not be true. Crude is being pumped, refined and consumed without significant excess that has no place to go.

The price reflects that reality.

And -

That some aren't able to afford oil doesn't mean that supply isn't efficiently aligned with demand; that's like saying since the right side of the economic bell curve can easily afford to pay more, the price is too low. Neither one addresses the issue of economic efficiency in the production and distribution of petroleum.

What you are talking about is a values discussion; who should benefit from the surplus value made available by achieving efficiency. I tend to agree with what I think is your point. Energy related natural resources do belong to everyone. The trouble is how do we distribute those benefits most 'fairly'? I don't think we are currently doing it 'fairly' and don't expect the current energy infrastructure to be able to ever provide such 'fairness'.

However, I do think that if battery technology lives up to the promise it is showing us, that it might serve to revolutionize a lot more than the transportation sector in the US. There are significant global implications. Such high density storage is what makes wind and solar viable for everyone, not just here in the US. This has long been known; I mean, that is what the hoopla about H and fuel cells has been about. For some reason, the fact that we are finding the solution in batteries instead of H seems to cause some people disorientation.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC