You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #7: in the USA at least [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
DrGregory Donating Member (427 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-26-10 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. in the USA at least

That's true in the USA only.

Other nations reprocess / recycle
spent nuclear fuel. If you do that,
you can recycle the long lived
radionuclides back to the reactor
as fuel.

The only thing you really have to
store is the fission products, but
they are short-lived. Cesium-137
is the longest lived fission product
and it decays to non-radioactive
Barium-137. The lifetime is only
30 years.

The multi-thousand year storage
problem is unique to the USA, because
Congress outlawed spent fuel recycle
back in 1978.

The technology was invented in the USA;
and our own Congress outlawed it at the
behest of the anti-nukes.

Dr. Greg
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC