Reply #43: You're wrong on all points but I gotta give you credit for being consistent

[txlibdem]

What in my post has "repeatedly been proven false" exactly? Proven by whom and when?

Which solution for a specific problem creates a different set of problems? You are talking gibberish. My post was about Pebble Bed Modular Reactors made from modular, mass produced components. You claim that mass production of exact components does not achieve savings in time and money. You obviously haven't heard of a man called Henry Ford, nor the assembly line. Nor have you heard of the VCR, DVD, computer components, or any of the thousands of other products that we enjoy today because they have been made using mass production on an assembly line. But I won't try to shoe-horn any logic into your carefully constructed reality, I guess.

You claim that nuclear power is not needed and that an unnamed alternative is immediately available. If this is true then why don't you name it and list its costs and construction timelines, its energy output on a per hour basis over a 24 hour period, and compare each of these to nuclear power, point for point.