You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #40: No, it won't [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
Dead_Parrot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-07-07 03:48 AM
Response to Reply #39
40. No, it won't
When conventional oil becomes too expensive, we'll just switch to the alternatives - tar sands and liquefied coal. There's no danger of them running out for a good few centuries, and they are much worse than oil, environmentally.

You're right that the US shutting of CO2 will not solve the problem (although 6 billions tons pa would be a good start). But I'm not aware of the US making any giant leaps towards stopping CO2 production: If anything, I think it's getting worse.

So that's one less thing to worry about, I guess. :silly:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC