Reply #128: I read every word.

[beevul]

"What don't you understand about legal precedence, where limitations placed on the Second Amendment can be used in court to put limits on other rights?"

That sentence, and the principle it espouses, are essentially correct. It says what it says. what you have read into it, is NOT what it says.

Painting ones opponent in a debate as an extremist, which IS what you are attempting, is the oldest trick in the book, and a transparent one at that.

"Then, the poster to whom I originally replied, compared that to a woman's right to choose. A specious comparison at best, a downright insulting one in actuality."


Please explain how it is insulting.