|
I wonder if they'll bother making DC's grade public now that they don't ban handguns...
They didn't when the ban was in effect, even though they would have most certainly given DC an A+++ Double good...In spite of the amount of gun violence.
So interesting, that they grade based on gun laws, rather than on the amount of gun violence in a given place...
But yeah...they're aiming at gun violence...
And I got some oceanfront property in the Arizona desert for sale too...cheap...
Lets examine the Brady bunch :
This is a group that has deliberately included adults in thier "statistics" to inflate them. No organization that has a legitimate intent to reduce gun violence would do such a thing.
This is a group that claims to want to prevent gun violence, yet gives grades on a per state basis based on how much they restrict guns rather than how high or low the level of gun crime/gun violence is in that state. Again, no organization that has a legitimate intent to reduce gun violence would do such a thing.
This is a group that claimed that civilian owned 50 caliber rifles which are esentially never used in crime could shoot down aircraft, which is a huge lie, and used that false rationale for stamping thier feet and screaming ban at the tops of thier lungs.
Again, no organization that has a legitimate intent to reduce gun violence would do such a thing.
This is a group that opposes concealed carry, even though police as a group are convicted of a larger number of crimes than CCW holders.
Once again, no organization that has a legitimate intent to reduce gun violence would do such a thing.
This is a group that claimed that "assault weapons" were the choice of criminals, in spite of the fact that ALL rifles - which 99 percent of so called "assault weapons" are - are used in less than 3 percent of all firearm homicides, and used that false rationale for stamping thier feet and screaming ban at the tops of thier lungs.
Once again, no organization that has a legitimate intent to reduce gun violence would do such a thing.
They may as well be "the brady campain to reduce guns", because 90 plus percent of the things they stump for are aimed squarely at doing just that.
And did I mention that they thought a republican would be a good fit as president of thier org?
No organization that has a legitimate intent to reduce gun violence would go after legally owned guns, unless thats what they want gone. They aren't interested in reducing gun violence unless its through restrictive gun laws aimed at people who by and large aren't a problem in the first place.
Do they look at root causes of gun violence? No. They go after guns.
Do they bother investigating how much the "war on some drugs" effects gun violence? Of course not. Like good little republicans they never bring that up, and go after guns instead.
As far as they're concerned, its the guns, and that should put them at odds with anyone who values his or her rights where firearms ownership is concerned.
|