You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #47: Who likes being condescended to? [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU
Liberal Classic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-04-04 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #45
47. Who likes being condescended to?
I know it's really hard for a lot of USAmericans to see the difference between blaming and problem-solving, as I've noted before, but there really is a difference.

If I have insulted you in such a way that you feel the need to reply like so, then I am sorry.

:(

If by "Why bother talking" you believe it to be a pointless excercise, what can I say? I am not trying to trick you with semantic games. I am not trying to mock or ridicule you. No one likes to be condescended to, but I strongly believe the above statement deserved a 'good grief' reply.


Back to the subject at hand...


- United States resident receives a licence as a Federal Firearms Licensee (FFL), lawfully acquires inexpensive firearms and then sells them for a large profit into the illicit crime gun market.

- Cross border truckers acquire firearms in the United States and smuggle them into Canada.

- Firearms are purchased at gun shows (secondary markets) in the United States and then smuggled into Canada.

- Canadian citizens obtain U.S. identification, purchase firearms and then smuggle them into Canada.

- STRAW purchases of firearms by U.S. residents, which are then smuggled into Canada.


These are good examples, thanks for posting them.

There seem to be two basic types of categories. Under one type, a weapon is acquired illegally in the U.S. and in the other the weapon appears to be a legal purchase. Numbers 2,4, and 5 are of the first type, and 1 and 3 are the second type. I shouldn't have to note but I will that all these curcumstances break U.S. federal law dealing with conspiricy to smuggle.

Nothing I have said should imply U.S. law enforcement could not use improvement in this area or generally. In trying to keep this thread based in facts, here's a page I found from the Canadian government generally on the topic of smuggling.

Criminal Intelligence Service Canada annual reports:

http://www.cisc.gc.ca/WebPage/index_b.htm

This one specifically had to do with various types of contraband:

http://www.cisc.gc.ca/AnnualReport2001/Cisc2001/contraband2001.html

The conclusion to me is that the border between the U.S. and Canada is extremely porous too all kinds of contraband, not just firearms. Also organized crime is growing in Canada, and though not reflected in this report it is on the rise in the U.S. as well.

I believe what we have is a mutual problem or border security.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC