Reply #52: Jeez, your reading comprension score must be abysmal.

[ConsAreLiars]

Either that or you are being deliberately obtuse and throwing out more non sequiturs to divert attention and discussion from the actual facts of the matter.

The original discussion was about the jackassery of the talking point blather that the mass slaughter of 1400 in Gaza was justified because of the rocket attacks. As I pointed out, Hamas kept to the terms of the cease fire even though the IDF never kept to their part of the deal, making the deal void and null. Nonetheless, Hamas dropped the numbers of rockets to nearly zero, even while the IDF never lifted the siege and murdered 13 and then 6 more on November 4. At which point Hamas realized that Israel never had any intention of keeping to its pledge, and that its word was not worth spit.and returned to its prior (bad) tactics.

As you certainly know, the three Israeli civilians were killed only after the murderous butchers controlling the IDF began slaughtering 1400 humans, destroying thousands of homes, hundreds of factories and fields, and destroying much of the economic, health, educational, and sanitary infrastructure.

Yes, I know it is necessary to multiply the injuries and harm done to one group by a hundred or five hundred and to multiply the other's injuries by zero in order to pretend or self-delude that there is some moral scale upon which the crimes and wrongs committed by both are sort of comparable but tilted such that your tribe/team is the superior one. No rational person uses that math.