Reply #91: boloboffin...finally an answer

[demodewd]

boloboffin states
Operation Northwoods is not fully understood until you realize that this false flag operation, which it was, was rejected by the White House, and that it proved unnecessary because Cuba was caught redhanded importing missiles from the Soviet Union.
The Cuban Missile crisis really had a lot more to do with the Soviets. The stand off between the two nations did not and would not initiate a US invasion of Cuba. Northwoods on the other hand was expressively designed to give rational for a US invasion.

In fact, the excesses of the 9/11 attacks wouldn't have been necessary if American officials had planned it. They could just as easily "seized" a shipment of chemical and biological weapons at a New York harbor, with manifests and associates tracing back all the way to whoever they wanted to frame. No actual deaths, but that would have been a potent "act of war" that would have justified the use of force against the "patsy" without the single loss of an American life. It's just too easy to come up with scenarios like that
9-11 was staged to permanently impress upon the American public that Arab terrorism is a menace to the world thus allowing the US and its military to justify any protracted military invasion(s)particularly into the Middle East. The importance of the event was this indelible psychological imprint it left on the masse's minds. Thus we are shown WTC2 being crashed into by allegedly Flight 175 with the horrific fireball to follow. Deaths are a necessary element for this kind of false flag operation.... the people jumping out of the Trade Center buildings...all to justify the intended military objective of NWO control of the world's depleting oil supply and other vital resources.
Is Bushco acting to secure the American dollar hegemony and neo-liberal (neo-liberal? Don't you mean neo-conservative?) global market dominance?
Neo-liberalism is the present deregulated globalist market philosophy of our present capitalistic economic system.Both parties in this very vital sense operate under the same economic paradigm.
We blame it on Osama because Osama did it. We can't help that Bush blames Osama too - that doesn't change the facts in the case. He had his motives, most of which were accomplished in the days after 9/11. American troops are out of Saudi Arabia. America has been drawn into a bitter feud in the Islamic world, which raises the specter of a nuclear religious war. And now American actions are heightening the religious component of this American opposition, from the atrocities at Abu Ghraib to Bush standing in the Resurrected City proclaiming the reign of Freedom, the gift of God that America has been called to bestow upon the world.

His arrogance will be our undoing. His arrogance is what Osama counted on. His arrogance must be put decisively out of office in this election.
Let me remind you that John Kerry and all but a handful of congress people and senators supported Bush and his invasion of Iraq. It's just the apocalyptic brashness of this controlled puppet that actually facilitated the agenda of American Imperialistic State and their NWO cohorts. Bush was the perfect set up salesman guy for the job. Now it may be very true that his boldness has outserved its purpose and this is why I do believe that many world aristocrats including the Rothechilds are leaning towards Kerry. America WAS NOT drawn into the Middle East. America put herself in the Middle East purposely to control the vital oil and other resourses in the region. In that it serves Greater Israel's policies is all for the better for such leadership as Ariel Sharon,Benjamin Netanjahuh and the Likud extremists.Yes..I agree that its best to see Bush leave office but America's and the NWO elitists have full intention of continuing to demonize Islam to justify and mask its true objectives...petrodollar hegemony and American military hegemony of the entire region.