Reply #145: It is not my defense.

[RH]

Nor so unhappy.
Why should I care?
The sensation is rather one of extraordinarily uninspired tedium.

:boring:

What's the game here supposed to be?
Does somebody hand out a prize to the winner?

With folded back what I said before appies.
Backwards or forwards is only meaningful according to the point of view and the actual time.

It is possible that one wing went forwards and the other went backwards.
Did anybody have a clear view of both wings at once?
I doubt it.
The starboard engine ran straight into a 30 ton elctricity generator and a tree.
That's perfectly clear and it would presumably make a difference.
The wings hit lamp poles.
That would presumably make a difference.
So what?
It is possible that a wing folded forwards when the fuselage first hit the building and then backwards when the engine and the wings hit the building.
Some of the accounts are precise.
A lot of it sounds like conjecture.
I don't know.
You don't know.
So what?

If one man says a dog had fleas and another says the dog had lice, does it prove there was no dog?

:eyes: